Pictures:
link:
http://www.classicarmy.com/productlist.jsp...p;gun_brand=DEF
Source:
Classic Army
http://www.classicarmy.com/news.jsp
Edited by Crimson, 29 October 2008 - 05:36 PM.
Classic Army
Started by
Crimson
, Oct 29 2008 05:33 PM
20 replies to this topic
#1
Crimson
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 4,674 posts
Obey My Will !
Posted 29 October 2008 - 05:33 PM
In a market already flooded with cheep and quality tactical gear, classic army have decided to jump into the pool, announcing their new line of tactical gear.
Pictures:
link:
http://www.classicarmy.com/productlist.jsp...p;gun_brand=DEF
Source:
Classic Army
http://www.classicarmy.com/news.jsp
Pictures:
link:
http://www.classicarmy.com/productlist.jsp...p;gun_brand=DEF
Source:
Classic Army
http://www.classicarmy.com/news.jsp
Wild 7- "We Sting More Than Once!"
WANTED:
WA Prowin Mags
For sale:
M4 Mags, AK Mags, Breaking G36c
Guides/Videos:
MOSFET GUIDE
WANTED:
WA Prowin Mags
For sale:
M4 Mags, AK Mags, Breaking G36c
Guides/Videos:
MOSFET GUIDE
#2
DarkLite
-
- Commercial User
-
- 10,174 posts
Yes, commander, my hat is large and my cloak is billowing.
Posted 29 October 2008 - 05:38 PM
Which looks to be essentially the same stuff that Gunner, RSOV, Ebaybanned and CRW sell, but I'm willing to bet it'll be marked up a bit.
#3
uscmCorps
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 5,902 posts
Have gun - will travel
Posted 29 October 2008 - 05:41 PM
I noticed that they seem to be listing what appears to be Multicam gear. I hope for their sakes it's using real CP Multicam fabric. Classic Army is too big a company to fly under the radar and dodge the CP bullet. 
PHOTOS: Check out my Gallery | YouTube: Check out my Channel
REVIEWS: Airsoft Innovations Tornado Impact Grenade Review | Beta Project Gun Rack Review | Magpul PTS - MOE Vertical Grip (MVG) and Rail Vertical Grip (RVG) Review | Magpul PTS EMAG and M-Version PMAG AEG Midcap Review | King Arms "Lancer Systems L5" AEG MidCap Review | Bitter End Airsoft Goggles™ Review | "Army of Two" Airsoft Skirmish Masks Review | TSI Armories Galil Series Review | Sykes Airsoft Face Mask Review
TUTORIALS: How to make a skirmishable "Heat" Hockey Mask | How to modify a Sansei Mask to work with ESS Goggles | How to modify a real VLTOR MOD/EMOD Stock | Magpul Ranger & "L" Type Floor Plate Installation | Making a Portable Metal Target Box
AAR: CQB Tactics Training with a Former "Tier 1" Operator, hosted by AEX
#4
Xsjado
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 224 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 29 October 2008 - 05:42 PM
They've gone after much smaller companies than CA before, thats for sure.
#5
Abelius
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 1,407 posts
"Brutes!"
Posted 29 October 2008 - 09:55 PM
Yessss, sue CA. 
Didn't Magpul do that already btw?
Didn't Magpul do that already btw?
Warning - User's posts may contain extremely negative attitudes towards Classic Army products.
#6
NeoVeNoM
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 1,838 posts
Mokkori!!!
Posted 29 October 2008 - 10:53 PM
ACM stuff.... Rebranded. Ah well, let's see what else is on... .
Challenge everything!!
#7
uscmCorps
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 5,902 posts
Have gun - will travel
Posted 30 October 2008 - 12:30 AM
QUOTE (Abelius @ Oct 29 2008, 02:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yessss, sue CA.
Didn't Magpul do that already btw?
Didn't Magpul do that already btw?
Magpul PTS generally looks out for Magpul stuff. Crye isn't affiliated with Magpul, so it wouldn't be Magpul going after CA on Crye's behalf. With that said, it has long been assumed that Crye wanted to do something about the replicas but were unable to being that the replicas were made and sold in China. However, taking into consideration Korean based Flyye Industries' recent proclamation that they will no longer and never again produce replica Crye products... That could be an indication that Crye is moving on the issue and making some headway.
Edited by uscmCorps, 30 October 2008 - 01:17 AM.
PHOTOS: Check out my Gallery | YouTube: Check out my Channel
REVIEWS: Airsoft Innovations Tornado Impact Grenade Review | Beta Project Gun Rack Review | Magpul PTS - MOE Vertical Grip (MVG) and Rail Vertical Grip (RVG) Review | Magpul PTS EMAG and M-Version PMAG AEG Midcap Review | King Arms "Lancer Systems L5" AEG MidCap Review | Bitter End Airsoft Goggles™ Review | "Army of Two" Airsoft Skirmish Masks Review | TSI Armories Galil Series Review | Sykes Airsoft Face Mask Review
TUTORIALS: How to make a skirmishable "Heat" Hockey Mask | How to modify a Sansei Mask to work with ESS Goggles | How to modify a real VLTOR MOD/EMOD Stock | Magpul Ranger & "L" Type Floor Plate Installation | Making a Portable Metal Target Box
AAR: CQB Tactics Training with a Former "Tier 1" Operator, hosted by AEX
#8
justin.kovacs
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 823 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 30 October 2008 - 12:43 AM
This stuff looks like complete junk.
Crappy, poorly made, airsoft junk.
I cant see why anyone would want to waste their hard earned money and buy this ###### when its only going to fall apart.... Look at what we do... Run around in the woods and shoot at each other.
Do you really think this stuff is going to hold up to the rigors of our hobby? I think not.
I would suggest sticking to the real deal gear like Eagle, Paraclete, Blackhawk and Tactical Tailor. Maybe even the higher end replica companies like Guarder, Pantac and G&P....
Rather entertaining though to say the least.....
Crappy, poorly made, airsoft junk.
I cant see why anyone would want to waste their hard earned money and buy this ###### when its only going to fall apart.... Look at what we do... Run around in the woods and shoot at each other.
Do you really think this stuff is going to hold up to the rigors of our hobby? I think not.
I would suggest sticking to the real deal gear like Eagle, Paraclete, Blackhawk and Tactical Tailor. Maybe even the higher end replica companies like Guarder, Pantac and G&P....
Rather entertaining though to say the least.....
#9
MrBlanks
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 423 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 30 October 2008 - 01:00 AM
Well to be fair people only airsoft for like a few hours every few weeks or so. I'm sure its not going to fall apart as you put it on and could be sufficient. I agree on just getting higher end replica gear though for those who play rough and can afford it.
According to their site, the gear has the hop up system. In that case I must get some.
According to their site, the gear has the hop up system. In that case I must get some.
#10
Isamu
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 2,970 posts
Gun Trafficker
Posted 30 October 2008 - 08:37 AM
Lets wait for prices and reviews... 
AIRSOFT ACHIEVEMENT LIST: Engineering and demolitions, Cheap bastid, Eagle eyes, Dedicated, Brainiac, Customizer, Infiltrator, Family man, Pimped Gun, Hippie, 1 of 300, Treasure hunter, Combat medic,Dance, F**ker Dance!, I Mean Business, First Do No Harm, Fortunate Son, Ninja (6 consecutive knife kills), deciever, David and Goliath,
Want to buy:
Second hand ICS M4 metal body and hop up chamber
#11
Beast06
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 731 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 30 October 2008 - 05:31 PM
QUOTE (MrBlanks @ Oct 30 2008, 01:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm sure its not going to fall apart as you put it on and could be sufficient.
This is CA we're talking about......
#12
NeoVeNoM
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 1,838 posts
Mokkori!!!
Posted 30 October 2008 - 06:21 PM
QUOTE (Beast06 @ Oct 30 2008, 06:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This is CA we're talking about......
indeed.
Though I noticed something the last couple of months, almost a year.
It looks like the CA AEG's in the US are of better quality than the once in Europe.( Or you guys are easily satisfied.
)Every retailer I spoke with here, says CA's quality is going downwards.
And now they are coming out with gear?
Challenge everything!!
#13
RUSHER2
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 246 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 30 October 2008 - 10:33 PM
On there website it says!
Hop up system yes! i must buy it!
Hop up system yes! i must buy it!
Sig image limit is 400x100.
#14
Mig1
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 322 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 01 November 2008 - 04:56 AM
Tactical Vest Classic III looks interesting. Like a non-releasable land version CIRAS that lacks the top row of webbing but has a six column front flap like the RBAV does.
#15
stop'n'go
-
- Members
-
- 56 posts
Adv Member
Posted 03 November 2008 - 03:40 AM
I wonder who is actually going to be manufacturing it. Classic Army is all tooled and aimed at producing aeg's. Seems like this would be something they would outsource to a gear specializing company.
"Have you ever noticed, everybody going slower than you is a moron, and anybody going faster than you is a maniac?"
...Do vegitarians/vegans eat animal crackers?
...Do vegitarians/vegans eat animal crackers?
#16
NeoVeNoM
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 1,838 posts
Mokkori!!!
Posted 03 November 2008 - 10:17 PM
QUOTE (stop'n'go @ Nov 3 2008, 04:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wonder who is actually going to be manufacturing it. Classic Army is all tooled and aimed at producing aeg's. Seems like this would be something they would outsource to a gear specializing company.
Almost everything is outsourced. It's the same with most other companies as well. Why do you think the gears are the same as ACM's?
It's very common. It's the same as the cars business.
Challenge everything!!
#17
unkle77
-
- Members
-
- 33 posts
Adv Member
Posted 04 November 2008 - 05:28 PM
Rebranded generic junk it appears to be.
I'm sure the maxpedition guy isn't too happy.
I'm sure the maxpedition guy isn't too happy.
#18
Mig1
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 322 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:10 PM
Do you guys recognize "Tactical Vest Classic III"? I can't remember ever seeing somebody else's product that looked exactly like that?
#19
NeoVeNoM
-
- Forum Regular
-
- 1,838 posts
Mokkori!!!
Posted 05 November 2008 - 10:28 PM
QUOTE (Mig1 @ Nov 4 2008, 07:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do you guys recognize "Tactical Vest Classic III"? I can't remember ever seeing somebody else's product that looked exactly like that?
Looks like the King arms MPS SAPI E3 Vest. Only less good.
Challenge everything!!
#20
Mig1
-
- Regular Poster
-
- 322 posts
Regular Poster
Posted 05 November 2008 - 10:47 PM
You mean this? http://www.kingarms.com/productpage.asp?prodid=1452
I don't think it looks very much like that.
I don't think it looks very much like that.
