WE GBB M14, HK416
#1
Posted 29 August 2009 - 02:56 PM
WE releases new pictures of upcoming KAC PDW and takes opportunity to reveal GBB M14 and HK416. Also on the rack of new guns is a SCAR with magwell obstructed, dare we hope for SCAR-H?
#2
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:02 PM
I have done 15 skirmishes in the last 12 months.
I am not UKARA registered, nor do I have any intention of becoming so.
#3
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:06 PM
Why all the PDWs all of a sudden? Why not something more interesting like G36s, AKs or even some decent SMGs?
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - B. Franklin
Oklahoma City Airsoft Group - Oklahoma Airsoft
Want to Sell:
Massive sale! OPEN TO TRADE!
WTB: Check my sale thread
#5
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:15 PM
#6
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:18 PM
SAVE OUR SPORT
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ScottishGunBan/
#7
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:20 PM
Edited by BrooklynBorn, 29 August 2009 - 03:25 PM.
I'm deep...like a kiddy pool.
#8
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:21 PM
Linky
But the pic in the OP link has a pic of the finished product


#9
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:24 PM
Amongst other things, these girls, who should not be allowed to handle weapons... EVER.


#10
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:26 PM
They tried to pull out the magazine, and is the EGLM made by WE?
also, they almost caused the dude next to them to require stitches
I'm deep...like a kiddy pool.
#11
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:35 PM
Are the WE SCAR L and HK416 actually licensed products?
A: To get to the same side.
If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.
#13
Posted 29 August 2009 - 03:51 PM
If they are, and the price will be a bit higher, will be offset by the presence of trademarks on the gun.
If the guns are not licensed this means that the guns will be cheaper, and probably only carry the "Safe/Semi/Auto" engravings on the lower receiver. This can however be mended to a rather low cost by visiting a local engraver and supplying your own desired artwork.


#14
Posted 29 August 2009 - 04:12 PM
If they are, and the price will be a bit higher, will be offset by the presence of trademarks on the gun.
If the guns are not licensed this means that the guns will be cheaper, and probably only carry the "Safe/Semi/Auto" engravings on the lower receiver. This can however be mended to a rather low cost by visiting a local engraver and supplying your own desired artwork.
I was really more concerned about the rights of the original manufacturers TBH.
WE makes a fuss about people ripping off their design and I find it kinda ironic that they then make copies of guns which could probably be protected in much the same way Magpul weapons are.
This doesn't apply to the M4 since the design has been legally defined as an "open source".
A: To get to the same side.
If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.
#15
Posted 29 August 2009 - 05:23 PM
#16
Posted 29 August 2009 - 05:36 PM
and heres me thinking the Scar was a fairly user friendly weapon to work! Clearly not
SAVE OUR SPORT
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ScottishGunBan/
#17
Posted 29 August 2009 - 06:10 PM
#18
Posted 29 August 2009 - 06:58 PM

#19
Posted 29 August 2009 - 08:17 PM
Edited by CKinnerley, 29 August 2009 - 08:17 PM.
REMF Tacticool - On Facebook, YouTube & Twitter
#20
Posted 29 August 2009 - 08:20 PM
+1
I don't see why the 416 can't have trades if WE can put engraved trades on their M14.















