Jump to content


- - - - -

Exclusive images of the ICS's new MP5 split gearbox!


31 replies to this topic

#1 FarEast

    Staff Writer

  • News Editors
  • 2,907 posts
  • Location:Yokohama Japan
  • Country:Japan

Posted 09 January 2008 - 02:28 AM

Well ICS are straight in there for 2008 news with the release of their new MP5 split gear box design. Owners of MP5's will know how difficult it is to break down and maintain the gear boxes on these models and ICS has worked hard in the closing months of 2007 to develop a gear box that makes this process easier.

Right now we have no other details on this, nor when it is likely to be released on to the market. But yet again it seems ICS is clearly listening to our requests and acting on them.

2008 will be a very innovative year for ICS.

So here it is:









#2 Epyon

    I hope you can see this, I'm doing it as hard as I can

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 827 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sandusky, Ohio - Home of Cedar Point amusement park
  • Country:United States

Posted 09 January 2008 - 02:30 AM

WooHoo! It's about time

*crosses fingers for mechanical burst too*

#3 RedScare

    ɹǝʇsod ɹɐ1nbǝɹ

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,328 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 02:33 AM

oh, ho. this sounds great. :3

NSW said:

.ǝsıʍɹǝɥʇo ǝʌıǝ1ǝq oʇ ǝsooɥɔ ı
.ɹǝʍod ɟo ǝsnqɐ uɐ sı sıuǝd ɔıʇuɐbıb ɐ buıʌɐɥ ɹoɟ uɹɐʍ uʍo ʎɯ buıɔnpǝɹ ʇɐɥʇ ǝsıɹoǝɥʇ p1noɔ ǝuo
:sʎɐs 1ɐɥsɹɐɯ_ʞpɯ

#4 Stealthbomber

    Forum Grinch

  • Global Moderators
  • 11,211 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 02:58 AM

That's just an M4 gearbox stuck into an MP5.

Note how the upper gearbox has the tab on it where it's supposed to be fixed in place by the M4 receiver pin.
Look at the MP5 receiver. There's no hole in the MP5 lower for any kind of locking pin to fit into.

I assume by the time this gets into production the gearbox housing will have been modified so the upper and lower receiver are locked together by the stock pin or, alternatively, ICS will have binned the tab on the upper receiver.

I suppose, OTOH, they might be building it that way so M4 uppers are compatible but that'd mean, ummm, nothing (besides the guns shell) is holding the 2 halves of the gearbox together. unsure.gif
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Mobius Strip?
A: To get to the same side.


If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.

#5 kevshin21

    cqb for life

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 03:07 AM

QUOTE (Stealthbomber @ Jan 8 2008, 06:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's just an M4 gearbox stuck into an MP5.

Note how the upper gearbox has the tab on it where it's supposed to be fixed in place by the M4 receiver pin.
Look at the MP5 receiver. There's no hole in the MP5 lower for any kind of locking pin to fit into.

I assume by the time this gets into production the gearbox housing will have been modified so the upper and lower receiver are locked together by the stock pin or, alternatively, ICS will have binned the tab on the upper receiver.

I suppose, OTOH, they might be building it that way so M4 uppers are compatible but that'd mean, ummm, nothing (besides the guns shell) is holding the 2 halves of the gearbox together. unsure.gif



I think your right.

#6 Galaxy613

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 294 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 03:11 AM

QUOTE (Stealthbomber @ Jan 8 2008, 09:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I suppose, OTOH, they might be building it that way so M4 uppers are compatible but that'd mean, ummm, nothing (besides the guns shell) is holding the 2 halves of the gearbox together. unsure.gif


Yeah... very good point there. I don't know if the insides of the MP5 are tight enough to keep the lower and upper gearbox togeather... before that post I was exploding with glee because it is SO MUCH better then TM's way.
-- CM.027 and etc. For Sale

MY GUNS/AEGs
JG G36C - I LOVE THIS GUN
CYMA CM.027 MP5J
KWC 1911 Springer

#7 RSM

    Regular Poster

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,034 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 03:23 AM

Theres a small list of things that if present, would have me sold faster than the last popular action figure on Christmas Eve:

- Still have the ability to fit a laser in the cocking tube
- Operation of cocking handle reveals hop adjustment
- As mentioned up thread, there is more than just the receivers holding the gearbox together

I get the feeling that the white end cap is attached to the GB M4 stylee via screw intro spring guide, so when you put the receiver together and screw the end cap on that holds everything together, perhaps not be best way of doing things but a full metal MP5 as easy to work on as their M4 line would be awesome, although I would hope ICS have moved onto using 4 'stop' bevel gears and better material in their trigger switches by now too.


Posted Image
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.

Perks:[Amphibious Operations][Bloody BB - Chin&Cheekbone][Butterfingers][Combat Engineer]
[Combat Journalist – Tachyon XC Helmet Cam][Death or Glory][Divine Intervention][Fire in the Hole! 6][Fortunate Son]
[Got Helmet But No Brain][Minigun Wannabe][Pyromaniac][Puppeteer][Quadruple Bypass][Quartermaster][Spoils of War]
[Weaponsmith]

#8 Stealthbomber

    Forum Grinch

  • Global Moderators
  • 11,211 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 04:38 AM

I hope they've come up with a better way to attach the cocking tube to the receiver.
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Mobius Strip?
A: To get to the same side.


If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.

#9 FarEast

    Staff Writer

  • News Editors
  • 2,907 posts
  • Location:Yokohama Japan
  • Country:Japan

Posted 09 January 2008 - 05:42 AM

Well Guys after a good old winge to the ICS team they are going to send us some more images of how it is attached.

#10 cazboab

    The Arbiter of Conversation

  • Global Moderators
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 05:52 AM

There's no chance they can fit a stick battery in above the gearbox to fit it with a slim foregrip or build an mp5k out of it later is there?
Posted Image

#11 lmission

    Adv Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 40 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 06:29 AM

if it's anything like the Army Armament R85 two piece gearbox, there will be a flange that slides the top gearbox into the bottom gearbox and the whole lot will be held by two pins. the receiver can then slide around the top gearbox and will not be a critical part in holding the unit together. i've had a lot of luck with that design (modified to M140 spring with 9.6V battery and over 10K rounds fired so far mostly in full auto).

oh and.....

CHEERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thank you ICS once again for showing us these designs. keep up the good work and for goodness sakes, get last year's guns out on the freeking market already. especially the L85 and the Galil!!

questions: will the new two piece gearbox fit in the old ICS MP5? how about adding the modified foregrip with the flashlight holder as a STANDARD PART? you know you want to do it....people want it.

tongue.gif



#12 uscmCorps

    Have gun - will travel

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,374 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 06:55 AM

This is very promising. Looking forward to seeing more.




#13 Wege

    Someone PM something that could be worthwhile huh?

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:6ft behind you.
  • Country:New Zealand

Posted 09 January 2008 - 08:17 AM

Excellent.
This can maybe solve a Permanent semi-only fix for items such as this to be imported into NZ.
I know I would love one.... biggrin.gif
Kiwis are boring.


Too poor to get even a Rent-a-Sig... or is that too cheap?

#14 Smurf

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 209 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 08:42 AM

This is an excellent enhancement to the ICS MP5 range if they get it done correctly, and as Stealth said it would be good if they could have a look at the way they attach the cocking tube to the upper receiver. I have snapped one in half myself, and I know a few others who have as well. ohmy.gif

#15 MDK_Marshal

    You think you're awesome, badly drawn Mel Gibson?

  • Sale/OffTopic Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A small hole in a muddy field, wondering where my artillery support is.
  • Country:United Kingdom

Posted 09 January 2008 - 09:31 AM

Sweet...

I've always had a hankering for an ICS M4, and now this... Damn you! Why must you be so good yet so expensive? ;_;

As a former owner of a TM MP5, I can attest to how much of a pain it can be. Hell, I prefer working on the G3, even though you have to remove the smallest screw on earth that no screwdriver fits to get to the gearbox. At least the upper receiver just slides forwards out of the way, instead of being integrated to the whole shebang dry.gif

But, yeah. The last two of RSM's three good things would also have me sold, if only I could afford one... Don't suppose ICS or a retailer would be kind enough to donate me one for review purposes? biggrin.gif

#16 thartwig

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 492 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:13 AM

Is it standard for their Mp5 to be wired for the foregrip and stock? cus that one is. Otherwise fairly interesting news, and i hope it turns out well. biggrin.gif
Not enough ICS!!!

#17 FireHawk102

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 169 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:20 AM

Expensive? What are you on? they are not expensive - considering the materials and the amount of R&D they do I think they are very reasonable!

MP5 - good move ICS smile.gif They've probably used an M4 one at this stage as it's early days!

ICS I have a request; Please please please can you have a look at revising the upper gearboxes for the M4 (and now the MP5 before you go to production). The one thing I'd love to see is the removal of the top 4 small screws that hold the two halves together and replace them with some sort of sliding piece that slots over the two halves and clamps them together. This would make life sooo much easier when changing components, in which I do very often.

Thanks ICS - keep up the amazingly good work!

Scott

#18 FireHawk102

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 169 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:21 AM

P.S - ******* 3-round burst would be AWESOME, PLEASE DO IT ICS *********

Edited by FireHawk102, 09 January 2008 - 10:21 AM.


#19 Stealthbomber

    Forum Grinch

  • Global Moderators
  • 11,211 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:32 AM

QUOTE (MDK_Marshal @ Jan 9 2008, 09:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As a former owner of a TM MP5, I can attest to how much of a pain it can be. Hell, I prefer working on the G3, even though you have to remove the smallest screw on earth that no screwdriver fits to get to the gearbox. At least the upper receiver just slides forwards out of the way, instead of being integrated to the whole shebang dry.gif

Indeed.

MP5s are really one of THE most old-fashioned designs, whereby the gun is basically and MP5-shaped shell with the mechanical parts simply stuffed inside in whatever way they fit. Bit like a FAMAS or Academy L85.
Even the standard M4 is slightly more user-freindly than the MP5, although that's probably more luck than judgement.

Having an MP5 that can be properly field-stripped is definately progress.
I just wonder if there's still sufficient market for an MP5 to support the sales of these.
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Mobius Strip?
A: To get to the same side.


If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.

#20 MDK_Marshal

    You think you're awesome, badly drawn Mel Gibson?

  • Sale/OffTopic Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A small hole in a muddy field, wondering where my artillery support is.
  • Country:United Kingdom

Posted 09 January 2008 - 12:43 PM

QUOTE (FireHawk102 @ Jan 9 2008, 10:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Expensive? What are you on? they are not expensive - considering the materials and the amount of R&D they do I think they are very reasonable!


I'm well aware that for what they are, they're a great deal. However, when you're a student with next to no income and rapidly shrinking overdraft, they're pretty damned expensive wink.gif

For people who AREN'T slumming heir way around, they are a damned good deal, especially if they continue the trend of listening to the community and trying to incorporate nifty things that will make them sell even better! smile.gif





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Site Meter