Jump to content


* * * * - 3 votes

Change your pants - CA gets LWRC License


82 replies to this topic

#1 aznriptide859

    Larueminati

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 08:14 AM

Now I'm not too big a fan for CA guns, but this is some awesome news - Classic Army has now received the license for LWRC International!

Here's the entire scoop, courtesy of AirsoftNews EU:



They state that CA has already made the M6A2 and PSD replicas (the latter being hawt as holy hot dogs)...could this mean the intro of a LWRC IAR?!?!? IT BETTER!

Hopefully their internals will also increase in quality - will definitely bring happiness to LWRC fans like me.

Posted Image


#2 Perch

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 284 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 08:48 AM

It's still Classicarmy so quality will be poor. And again just some more Armalite-lookalikes.
Posted Image <-- That's a perch
http://www.airsoft-verband.ch/

So, if you have a problem, if no one else can help and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team

#3 Mat

    Bundesbear... rawr!

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 695 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:12 AM

This is awesome news, because if there is a real lack of anything in the airsoft marketplace, it's M16/M4 variants.

ranting2.gif

Posted Image


View Posthwagan, on 09 March 2011 - 10:06 AM, said:

I've also heard rumours they're (Zero One) plotting with Umarex to block out the sun and kill pandas.

#4 uscmCorps

    Have gun - will travel

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,373 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 11:52 AM

Actually, I think Orca scooped this news way before AirsoftNews did when he posted pics of the Spartan Import booth at this year's SHOT Show. Pics showed LWRC rifles trademarked ARs. While this is awesome news none the less, CA needs to make sure they do this right because the pics seen so far showed LWRC ARs with trademarks but incorrectly accessorized and the trademark and finish looking kinda so-so.

CA really needs to take a page out of Madbull and Magpul's playbook and get these done as accurately as possible. My hat goes off to them for getting the license, but they really need to work on the follow through.

CA, take the time to do it right! Doing that will help sales more than cutting corners and doing it cheap.

(My two cents of course.)

#5 masakarijoe

    US Marine, 0931 CMT

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheltenham, PA / Yuma, AZ
  • Country:United States

Posted 11 February 2009 - 01:12 PM

i do infact need to change my pants... especially because i just ordered all the parts needed to make the IAR tongue.gif
very exciting, especially if they make an IAR. but an M6A2 would be almost as cool.
need pics please (even the ones from orcas post, i lost those)
-Joe

"AS MARINES, OUR MESSAGE TO OUR FOES HAS ALWAYS BEEN ESSENTIALLY THE SAME: WE
OWN THIS SIDE OF THE STREET! THREATEN MY COUNTRY OR OUR ALLIES AND WE WILL
COME OVER TO YOUR SIDE OF THE STREET, BURN YOUR HUT DOWN, AND WHISPER IN YOUR
EAR 'CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?' AND THEN SECURE YOUR HEARTBEAT."

-JAMES M. "MIKE" LOWE, COLONEL, USMC


#6 Magsz

    Member of AA since 1998. Airsoft Anonymous

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,084 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 02:12 PM

I posted up some info about these in the shot show thread i think. I honestly dont remember where it is.

Here's the skinny.

1. The guns feature the same horrible CA finish.
2. The gas piston system is replicated in a less than realistic manner. The knobs that detach the upper rail system are the wrong size and the piston and piston cup just look plain weird.
3. Laser engraved trademarks are the lamest ###### ever. Lets get some realistic rollmarks going here PLEASE.

Those are the cons. Here are the Pro's.

1. The guns charging handle ROCKS. The bolt plate is HEAVY and when you rack that bitch it feels like you've actually got some friction to fight in order to "chamber" a round. Fantastic job CA, i really dig it.
2. The selector switches are AWESOME. The most realistic selector switch ive ever felt on an airsoft gun. For those of us that actually exercise weapon discipline and safety, safetying and unsafetying these weapons is going to be a joy for the end user.
3. The overall design of the guns, to LWRC's credit is very nice. The PSD is a really pointable little gun and should delight CQB users.

Some suggestions would be to have the guns come packaged with MOE accessories. That would greatly increase the value and attractiveness of the guns to consumers. Fix up the CA internals, i get rid of the suspect ball bearings and you've got a genuine winner on your hands so long as the hopup units are performing.
Wasted__youf: "seriously, who *fruitcage* cares! Go get laid."

#7 Trasher

    natural born skeptic

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,640 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hungary
  • Country:Hungary

Posted 11 February 2009 - 02:37 PM

OMG, another M16/M4 variant!!!
I'm seriously (un)impressed!

#8 HaVoC

    - 51% MOTHERF***ER - 49% SON OF A B***H -

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13,626 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 04:42 PM

QUOTE (Trasher @ Feb 11 2009, 02:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
OMG, another M16/M4 variant!!!
I'm seriously (un)impressed!

Yeah, this is getting pretty old now. If you don't like them, don't post in the threads and don't buy the damn guns.
[center]Posted Image

Quote

no fing duh retard, ur probably the stupidest person i've met ever, i've met some retarted people
NOW SPLITTING CA M15A4 W/ RAS
AWESOME GUCCI GEAR YOU SHOULD REALLY BUY!
</div>

#9 orca

    The Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla

  • Global Moderators
  • 1,263 posts
  • Location:Behind the Orange Kurtain, So. Kalifornia.
  • Country:United States

Posted 11 February 2009 - 04:45 PM

Pics are here from the earlier Spartan Imports, Shot Show post:

http://s182.photobucket.com/albums/x79/DIG...w2009/?start=20
Posted Image
Putting my money where my mouth is...
OMFG The A.I.C.S. is NOT an L96, AWP or AWM!!!

#10 Angry

    Always outnumbered, never outgunned.

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,625 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 05:33 PM

Here's the future weapons segment about the IAR. I remember thinking at the time 'and the great thing about this is...'. I love Armalites, but I really don't see this as anything to get that excited about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQR_9sye984

#11 aznriptide859

    Larueminati

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 06:29 PM

^That's why I fell in love with them.

They look pretty good in those pics (at least the RIS does), but I'm guessing the RS trades aren't like that, correct?

Posted Image


#12 masakarijoe

    US Marine, 0931 CMT

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheltenham, PA / Yuma, AZ
  • Country:United States

Posted 11 February 2009 - 06:55 PM

they looks great, thanks for the pics.
i really hope that they make an M6A4 IAR...
or maybe an M6A3 DMR
-Joe

"AS MARINES, OUR MESSAGE TO OUR FOES HAS ALWAYS BEEN ESSENTIALLY THE SAME: WE
OWN THIS SIDE OF THE STREET! THREATEN MY COUNTRY OR OUR ALLIES AND WE WILL
COME OVER TO YOUR SIDE OF THE STREET, BURN YOUR HUT DOWN, AND WHISPER IN YOUR
EAR 'CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?' AND THEN SECURE YOUR HEARTBEAT."

-JAMES M. "MIKE" LOWE, COLONEL, USMC


#13 uscmCorps

    Have gun - will travel

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,373 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 06:58 PM

QUOTE (Angry @ Feb 11 2009, 09:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Here's the future weapons segment about the IAR. I remember thinking at the time 'and the great thing about this is...'. I love Armalites, but I really don't see this as anything to get that excited about.

Outwardly it doesn't look much different than a regular AR variant. What makes this very attractive in the real steel world is how it operates using an open bolt in full auto which keeps everything cool and minimizes weapon malfunctions. Plus you can bum ammo from other squad mates as it uses AR mags. Personally I'm kinda shocked the 249 isn't being replaced by the IAR and will most likely be replaced by a closed bolt AR style system by Colt or FN... but that's probably more politics than anything.

Yes it doesn't look particularly remarkable. That's really no different than any other AR variant out there. But there's a reason why people go ga-ga over having trademark X on their ARs... it's the illusion that you have something that performs on a whole other level and you like the look of it. In the end though, it's just a Version 2 GB wrapped in parts. But this is airsoft. It's what we do. biggrin.gif

#14 Inq Eisenhorn

    I'd let her bite me!!

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,340 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 07:36 PM

I'm honestly confused.....and while I take on board the suggestion that if you don't like something, then don't post.....I have to ask genuinely if people are really taken by yet another M4 variant.

Yes, I watched the YouTube clip, and yes its all very impressive, the killing potential of the real thing....but in airsoft, its just a case around a very "ordinary" gearbox, that you can find on any other AEG?!?!?......will CA take short cuts and use moulds and dies from their current M4 line up? you bet your butt they will.....so why all the excitment?
no news is by far the best news, and sometimes even good news!

#15 HaVoC

    - 51% MOTHERF***ER - 49% SON OF A B***H -

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13,626 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 07:54 PM

QUOTE (uscmCorps @ Feb 11 2009, 06:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes it doesn't look particularly remarkable. That's really no different than any other AR variant out there.

That's half of the point, actually. The 'automatic rifleman' in a squad now doesn't stick out as badly as a guy with a SAW, so he's less likely to be targeted specifically by the enemy.
[center]Posted Image

Quote

no fing duh retard, ur probably the stupidest person i've met ever, i've met some retarted people
NOW SPLITTING CA M15A4 W/ RAS
AWESOME GUCCI GEAR YOU SHOULD REALLY BUY!
</div>

#16 CKinnerley

    Is it tea break yet?

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,854 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 08:10 PM

There's a lot of ingenuity in the design of the mechanism I think (in terms of the open bolt functionality), but we moved away from the L86 as a support weapon because... well, you can't use it as a proper light support weapon, 30 round mags just didn't cut it, as many british troops discovered through multiple conflicts over the years. Hence why we bought up the Minimi, the whole idea of the IAR seems rather backwards and hints at narrow minded thinking to be honest.
-SAC(T) Kinnerley, RAF Armourer

Posted Image

#17 uscmCorps

    Have gun - will travel

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,373 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:02 PM

QUOTE (Inq Eisenhorn @ Feb 11 2009, 11:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm honestly confused.....and while I take on board the suggestion that if you don't like something, then don't post.....I have to ask genuinely if people are really taken by yet another M4 variant.

Yes, I watched the YouTube clip, and yes its all very impressive, the killing potential of the real thing....but in airsoft, its just a case around a very "ordinary" gearbox, that you can find on any other AEG?!?!?......will CA take short cuts and use moulds and dies from their current M4 line up? you bet your butt they will.....so why all the excitment?

It's airsoft. The same can be said about any gun that uses a Version 2 GB. They pretty much all perform the same. Some look more different than others. In airsoft it's all about the look. It's 99% illusion.

QUOTE (HaVoC @ Feb 11 2009, 11:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's half of the point, actually. The 'automatic rifleman' in a squad now doesn't stick out as badly as a guy with a SAW, so he's less likely to be targeted specifically by the enemy.

Yep. That too.

QUOTE (CKinnerley @ Feb 11 2009, 12:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There's a lot of ingenuity in the design of the mechanism I think (in terms of the open bolt functionality), but we moved away from the L86 as a support weapon because... well, you can't use it as a proper light support weapon, 30 round mags just didn't cut it, as many british troops discovered through multiple conflicts over the years. Hence why we bought up the Minimi, the whole idea of the IAR seems rather backwards and hints at narrow minded thinking to be honest.

On the plus side, with an M4 layout you're not restricted to a 30 round mag. 100 round drum mags seem to be gaining popularity in the military community, and from the sounds of it, drum mags are the primary mag LWRC had in mind when building the IAR. It should also be noted that pretty much all the new rifles being considered for replacement of the current M249 have essentially AR 556 Layouts. The ergonomics of the L86A1 never seemed drum mag friendly to me.

#18 masakarijoe

    US Marine, 0931 CMT

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cheltenham, PA / Yuma, AZ
  • Country:United States

Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:07 PM

i agree. i think the whole idea of a support weapon firing from magazines of that low of capacity is absurd. HOWEVER, a lighter, smaller, and less visable weapon IS needed for the role, and the IAR fits that bill. as far as the magazine capacity goes, im sure that if this weapon is adopted, we will arm gunners with a high capacity magazine when it is seen to be needed. in addition, the IAR is not REPLACING the SAW, merely supplementing it, for the occasions when a 200 round belt is not expected to be needed.
and finally, CA has not mentioned anywhere that they are making an IAR, just a LWRC trademarked M6A2 carbine, which in the real world is a fantastic carbine. and with CA quality (yes, i said CA quality because they are infact one fo the best and most successful airsoft companies PERIOD) to back it up, im sure it will be a nice piece to add to any collection, or use in any skirmish. any more news on this rifle, or more plans for CA and LWRC would be great. in addition, any more pictures would be fantastic. is there a signifigant difference (if any) between the M6A2 and PSD?
im glad that CA now have another brand to add to their list. no, this AEG is not "revolutionary" or new, but neither was any AR based AEG for the last few years. now they are just for the slightly different looks, and brands.
if you dont like it, then get out of this thread. im sick of seeing your ######.
you dont see me posting everytime they make another AIMS, AKS, AKMS, AK47, AK74, AKSEXTOOMUCH, etc.
-Joe

"AS MARINES, OUR MESSAGE TO OUR FOES HAS ALWAYS BEEN ESSENTIALLY THE SAME: WE
OWN THIS SIDE OF THE STREET! THREATEN MY COUNTRY OR OUR ALLIES AND WE WILL
COME OVER TO YOUR SIDE OF THE STREET, BURN YOUR HUT DOWN, AND WHISPER IN YOUR
EAR 'CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?' AND THEN SECURE YOUR HEARTBEAT."

-JAMES M. "MIKE" LOWE, COLONEL, USMC


#19 kodiak22

    Regular Poster

  • Regular Poster
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 605 posts

Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:46 PM

honestly i cant wait i love the M6a2, and a3( and hoping to get my own RS very soon) so to have an airsoft replica for it would be great.
" If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, it is because your tactics suck"
- A Retired Marine 1st SGT.

#20 NeoVeNoM

    Mokkori!!!

  • Forum Regular
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,593 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gangsters paradize, no really!
  • Country:Belgium

Posted 11 February 2009 - 10:23 PM

How is the top rail constructed?
It looks a bit the same as a 416. The sides of the RAS (or RIS) are a bit different, but overall, it looks the same.
But then again I am no expert in Armalites by far. For Airsoft it is indeed the trades and the flash that does it, like 99% of all airsoftguns, regardless of it being an AR, G36, or AK.
But as RS, it makes a lot of sense.

Too bad it's not going to be a company like VFC who is going to produce these.
Oh well, we must think positive, CA should have the know how to pull it off.
Posted Image
Challenge everything!!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Site Meter