Daytonaguns Up coming models
#1
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/user/daytonagasblowback
Justines Website will be http://www.daytonagun.com
Not currenly live
Taken from
http://classicairsoft.org/forum/viewtopic....f=2&t=11060
#2
Posted 04 March 2009 - 02:15 PM
#3
Posted 04 March 2009 - 02:18 PM
its all limited production. cept his AKs.
Edited by Horsem4n, 04 March 2009 - 02:19 PM.
[Chameleon][Got helmet, but no brain][One shot, one kill][Steady aim-5 misses, 30 feet][Customizer]
#4
Posted 04 March 2009 - 02:27 PM
Edited by frogfish, 04 March 2009 - 02:28 PM.
#5
Posted 04 March 2009 - 02:35 PM
i wonder if he'll start doing drop in kits for AKs and AR15s as well. obviously they wont be as good as the proper systems but i'm sure he'd get loads of interest from people who want to give classics a try but want a system that they can swap between guns and that wont cost the earth and require permanent mods. remember how much interest that escort mechbox prototype got?
it'd certainly be a wise move IMO, i'm sure anyone that could afford a proper conversion would pay for one over the drop in, while the drop in would cater for those slightly less well off.

down with imageshack.us! say no to stupid links and ads (use photobucket instead ;))
GTX 275 graphics card up for grabs, PM me if you're interested
#6
Posted 04 March 2009 - 11:02 PM
Mike
#7
Posted 04 March 2009 - 11:42 PM
#8
Posted 05 March 2009 - 06:15 AM
#9
Posted 05 March 2009 - 12:09 PM
Not for me - I'll wait for the next gen from WE etc. with all the bugs ironed out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Omnes una manet nox - Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat
"There's a thin line between success and failure - it's called Hadrian's Wall" © Charlie Brooker
#11
Posted 05 March 2009 - 01:49 PM
Not for me - I'll wait for the next gen from WE etc. with all the bugs ironed out.
External Gas isn't for everyone, especially when it costs this type of money. If anyone liked the same thing it would be a very boring world.
It’s well worth it for me, and looking around some others too, and isn’t it nice to see new stuff being brought out, even if it doesn’t really interest you?
#12
Posted 05 March 2009 - 04:50 PM
so having a hard kicking, reliable AK with no cooldown is missing the boat? this came out before the GHK, which is very flawed, suffers from all the usual GBB problems and has proprietary mags with a low capacity (not an issue for me, but a turn off for some) and that cost the earth to have a full setup.

down with imageshack.us! say no to stupid links and ads (use photobucket instead ;))
GTX 275 graphics card up for grabs, PM me if you're interested
#13
Posted 05 March 2009 - 04:51 PM
Edited by my_plague_666, 05 March 2009 - 04:53 PM.

down with imageshack.us! say no to stupid links and ads (use photobucket instead ;))
GTX 275 graphics card up for grabs, PM me if you're interested
#14
Posted 05 March 2009 - 05:05 PM
The only drawback that people complain about is the external rig, and it's usually one of two things. First "I don't have anywhere to put it" simple solution, your carrying to much *suitcase* lighten the load anyway. Second "I can't ditch my weapon when I want to because I'm attached to it" well if your an idiot and permanently attached your rig to your weapon, that's your fault, but for all of us who actually read you can use quick detach fittings that are common and cheap, and then using the rig is NO DIFFERENT THAN WEARING A SLING.
Seriously the only valid argument against them is that parts can be hard to come by, but then again these parts just don't break that often to worry about it, and all use standard O-ring sizes that you can pick up at the local hardware store.
Personally I would prefer someone furthering the BV system and LRBs as those truly preform, I mean we're talking ridiculous fps sniper rifle performance at CQB safe velocities, and ROF so fast it'd give most support weapons a run for their money. But mags can be hard to come by (not really if you know where to look) and parts can be hard to find (if they break, and again uses standard size O-rings).
Edited by frogfish, 05 March 2009 - 05:08 PM.
#15
Posted 05 March 2009 - 09:21 PM
#16
Posted 05 March 2009 - 09:36 PM
anyone else but me notice that bizon?
man i am hoping to get my CA XM177 converted to escort this year... i'm going back to gas.
#17
Posted 05 March 2009 - 10:26 PM
The Kalash AK has a good body, I like it actually
The A&K support weapons are considerable cheaper than alternatives, so I'll give that a pass.
But I see him using a lot of DBoys M4's as bases. To me that's just uninviting. He's getting these things much cheaper in HK, an extra $150 to use G&P's would be more inviting.
I know he can mod whatever I'd want to send to him, but having the completed product available to purchase would win over more people.
"every stupid airsofter" said:
I dislike every self proclaimed airsoft "wizard"; especially Jack Ma.
#18
Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:05 PM
He uses D-boys replicas as we are all cheap, not everyone want's to spend the extra $150 when they are already spending 1k. If you want something better it's available, but you have to make up the difference in price.
But you've already stated that you knew that... So why are you complaining about something that is a non-issue?
#20
Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:28 PM
Because I would think that when you're offering a product at $1500 another $100-$200 is not a killer, especially when the difference in quality is going to be very noticeable. It's just that, with all the options available, I just don't get why a DBoys M4 to start.
And the conversion market is a very different market, people who know what it's all about, people who have paid the money before to have parts machined are going to be much more particular.
I saw this a being an effort to attract those who are willing to pay more for something cool, but would want it high end all around.
For example, if I were to want one, I'd want something that would be great out of the box and all around. If I had to go out of my way just to get a good shell, it could dissuade me. But my though is based on the idea that this is an attempt to go more mainstream. If it's not, then whatever; everything I have said is a non-issue.
"every stupid airsofter" said:
I dislike every self proclaimed airsoft "wizard"; especially Jack Ma.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





















