FACSpitfire97 Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Hello all, Found this while surfing the CA product catalog, searched and couldn't find anything about it. Sorry if this is a repost. CA SG552 To be honest, I'm not a big fan of the of the trademarks, but who knows what others would go for. And for the record, I don't know any further details, so I wouldn't be the person to ask. Regards, Zachary Link to post Share on other sites
tosuzu Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 If only SIG 552 parts were widely avalible as the AK, Armalite, or G36 Series Link to post Share on other sites
GuzziHero Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Snakes alive! Those are the most godawful trademarks ever to be laid on an airsoft gun What in the hell were they thinking? I dont like the 552 (other SIGs are ok) anyway but...Id never touch a gun with trades that bad. Link to post Share on other sites
NeoVeNoM Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Another expensive clone... their R&D has done an outstanding job, again. Maybe it has blowback (not recoil of course, they can't clone that fast ), but it's just a gimmick anyways. For shame. Link to post Share on other sites
polystyrene Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 Always liked sig 552s myself. Link to post Share on other sites
BigAl Posted June 2, 2009 Report Share Posted June 2, 2009 CA do seem to be specalizing in horrible trade marks lately. Link to post Share on other sites
ST19AG_WGreymon Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 It's good that they're painted, which means they can be removed. Link to post Share on other sites
smelsonlaflin Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 right, then you're left with a trademark-less gun which is what raises the price in the first place. im disappointed with CA. im selling my current CA slr-105 right now for a G&G aims. there's just better rifles out there for the money. I'm through with CA aeg's. :/ Link to post Share on other sites
morugatu Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 I'm through with CA aeg's. :/ No worries, you're not alone in trying and giving up on CA. And as for this, meh, not for me, but hey, another 552 on the market means higher odds of a wider variety of aftermarket parts, right? Link to post Share on other sites
buggyr333 Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 Disgusting trades. Overly fat grip (like the Marui), probably a direct clone of the marui (which when it comes to body design, is a horrible design) I love sigs to death, and this makes me cry. Link to post Share on other sites
Alakdan101 Posted June 3, 2009 Report Share Posted June 3, 2009 good thing they include the optic rails...but the marking yaicks Link to post Share on other sites
fiddlesticks4220 Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 OK those markings are STUPID! Gun is most likely just a sig. Link to post Share on other sites
Pinkfloyd Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 Those ARE pretty ghasty and I'm not known for being picky :/ I DO like me a Sig tho Link to post Share on other sites
tinydata Posted June 4, 2009 Report Share Posted June 4, 2009 gurk...those are horrible trades, and I'm not a stickler for those things! I really don't care about markings, but those are just horrendous! I'm glad I dropped CA a long time ago. Very glad. Link to post Share on other sites
orca Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Hi res poster from CA: Link to post Share on other sites
Perch Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Better wait for the G&G GS553. There is something in the bush. It will take it's time, but will be worth the price like the G&G GS550 Link to post Share on other sites
Grobut Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 My eyes! zeh goggles do nasing! When will CA learn that no trades are better than horrible painted on rubbish ones? Well judging by the size of thease things, they haven't, and instead think that making them more than twice the size will force us to like them somehow And yes, it looks like a TM clone. Link to post Share on other sites
Marginal Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 I have to agree that the trademarks are horrendous. But I don't think it justifies bashing on CA for the overall quality of their products. I think they've done a good job so far with their guns compared to something like 7 or 8 years ago with their crappy line of MP5's. I have no experience with CA myself but recently purchased the CA33K A3 which sports no trademarks at all. I find it is solidely built, good external finish and gets the job very well done. My only complaint is that CA has come up with mid-caps only recently. I bought some hi-caps because they were the only ones with enough BB capacity and sold in packages Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.