Azimuth piston
#1
Posted 31 October 2009 - 05:26 PM
There supposedly really cheap, too. Only $13.50
greg, on Jan 30 2010, 09:19 AM, said:
MASTURBATION! ;)
#2
Posted 31 October 2009 - 05:42 PM
THE GAME
(you just lost it)
CBMPC! youtube channel - here! - game footage, random adventures, reviews and much more coming soon!
Follow the CBMPC! airsoft team on twitter @cbmpc
perks [combat journalist] [tunnel rat] [recon specialist] [bloody bb - hand, face] [weaponsmith] [navigation expert] [dedicated] [last man standing] [sugar rush] [humpty dumpty] [die hard] [silicone mouth] [fragile] [son of rambo] [family man] [guardian] [amphibious operations] [critical hit] [deceiver] [banzaaiii] [gun nut 10+] [yummy - lots] [spoils of war]
#3
Posted 31 October 2009 - 05:45 PM
#5
Posted 31 October 2009 - 07:14 PM
/fail
Ya i dont think lateral pressure on the piston is ever a problem in a gear box. And i dont think ive ever heard of an entire piston just shattering inside a gearbox... So this is just a display of its reinforced uselessness. Now, if they showed tests regarding the pistons teeth then that would be something worth investing in.
#6
Posted 31 October 2009 - 07:21 PM
Agreed, I would like to see a test comparing it to a supercore, or putting it a gearbox with M150 and running a li-po.
As for knowing where it is sold, I do not know yet sorry.
greg, on Jan 30 2010, 09:19 AM, said:
MASTURBATION! ;)
#7
Posted 31 October 2009 - 09:23 PM
"You cannot invade the mainland United States.
There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
#8
Posted 01 November 2009 - 12:00 AM
As a rule, when things are bendy they're also soft and that means the teeth are likely to wear out pretty quick.
The other important thing is the quality of the metal teeth.
I bought one of those Element polycarbonate pistons that had summat like 6 metal teeth.
To be fair, it didn't actually "break" but, when I took the piston out to do some other work, I discovered that the rack of metal teeth had split between EVERY tooth.
Instead of one lump of metal there was six seperate bits, all wedged together.
Not good.
A: To get to the same side.
If you're making a commercial post (advertising something you sell for profit) and you haven't asked for, and received, a "Commercial User" tag you should expect your posts to be deleted and to receive warning points.
#9
Posted 01 November 2009 - 01:19 AM
As a rule, when things are bendy they're also soft and that means the teeth are likely to wear out pretty quick.
The other important thing is the quality of the metal teeth.
I bought one of those Element polycarbonate pistons that had summat like 6 metal teeth.
To be fair, it didn't actually "break" but, when I took the piston out to do some other work, I discovered that the rack of metal teeth had split between EVERY tooth.
Instead of one lump of metal there was six seperate bits, all wedged together.
Not good.
I dont think it had metal teeth...or is their more than 1 version?
#10
Posted 01 November 2009 - 01:25 AM
http://www.wgcshop.com/wgc2008/main/produc...s=New%20Release
http://www.wgcshop.com/wgc2008/main/produc...s=New%20Release
GuzziHero said:
OP Morning After 6.5, You don't know man, You weren't there!

Lees Precision Engineering
#11
Posted 01 November 2009 - 04:15 AM
On the metal version it simply comes down to whether the teeth are sintered or machined from a nice bit of metal
On the plastic tooth version will be interesting to see. I think for $14 bucks its worth trying out on a gun though
LBT & Eagle DFLCS Kit, M56/67 Pouches, C02 Pouch Sale
#12
Posted 01 November 2009 - 06:37 AM
Now the stress test that matters to me is if they took a pair of pliers and individually clamped each tooth on that piston. Of course, since it is just a video, we'd have no true way of knowing if they kept the pressure the same between the piston displayed and some off-brand piston.
From practice though, using pliers to rip off a deepfire tooth is super hard, TM's pop right off, CA's mush like they're nothing, and most stock Chinese pistons mush a bit before coming off.
Basically I got bored one day repairing guns and decided to mess around with my pistons that were already missing teeth or needed some pulled off for AOE.
Swimming in a fish bowl
Year after year
Running over the same old ground
What have we found?
The same old fears
Wish you were here." - Pink Floyd
#13
Posted 01 November 2009 - 07:19 AM
Most often heard saying: is it safe? 8(
I concur about the video test being pointless.
#16
Posted 01 November 2009 - 10:16 AM
#17
Posted 01 November 2009 - 11:35 AM
look at 0.50secs on the vid, looks like there is a crak in ths piston:
Please heal me!!!!!
I cant sleep!!
Thought I was unbreakable but this is killing me!!
Stealthbomber, on Feb 20 2008, 12:15 AM, said:
That's all the upgrades you need.
www.madmercsairsoft.co.uk Is back up, with a new design and more reviews
#19
Posted 01 November 2009 - 06:01 PM
Looks can be deceiving though Chownsy. Watch the vid in HD and you can see its just a scuff from where the pliers held onto the piston.
#20
Posted 01 November 2009 - 09:25 PM
While this is not a discussion on the new Azimuth piston, there are a few observations I would like to make re: piston and gear wear.
So far that I have observed, there are 5 kinds of piston wear and breakage.
1) The wear occurs teeth to the rear of the piston, this is caused by 3 factors:
- Incorrect slope of the rearmost tooth (as seen on the G&G L85s)
- Piston head is too thick or too thin, means that the first sector tooth engages with the 2nd rearmost tooth or it eats into the rearmost tooth (hence why many pistons have the 2nd rearmost tooth trimmed down)
2) The wear occurs throughout the piston, caused by:
- Soft material used on the piston (King Arms grey pistons, G&P blue POM, Element clear Red pistons, systema red pistons)
3) The wear occurs at the front teeth of the piston, caused by:
- Worn last tooth of the sector gear (if the gears are non hardened steel or sintered powder steel like G&P or old Systema TU/STU/ITU gears, use of deepfire full steel pistons)
- Worn frontmost steel tooth plate of the piston (G&P, Guarder)
- Broken frontmost steel tooth plate of the piston (Guarder, unmodified CA)
4) The rear most tooth breaks off, caused by:
- a thin piston head, forcing the sector gear tooth to apply directly onto the rearmost tooth.
- material of the piston is brittle (Element Red, Systema Red, G&P POM Blue, Arear 1000 Black)
5) The gears experiences a failure:
- Worn, from the use of over hardened steel piston teeth (Marui zinc gears, and any non hardened steel or sintered steel powder gear sets like Systema or G&P)
- Sheared (Marui gears)
- Fracture (usually occurs more bevel gears than sector gears, can occur with any gearset)
----------------------------------------
From since the airsoft article on piston strength on airsoftmechanics were published, there has been an impression that CA pistons (along with marui pistons) are weak pistons.
In stock form coupled with moderate spring upgrade they do not seem to last a long time on tests. I agree.
However the tests cannot conclude that these pistons are weak. In fact they are very much some of the best pistons I have seen in terms of materials.
The thing is finding out WHY the pistons break. With the list of 5 types of piston wear and breakages, one can determine what makes the CA and Marui pistons break.
The CA piston has 2 issues:
1) the frontmost steel tooth plate is moulded to sit too far forward of the piston, and that causes the sector gear tooth AND the front tooth to wear. Modifying the piston to let the steel plate to sit back a little will decrease that wear.
2) the 2nd rearmost tooth engages with the sector gear. Sanding down the 2nd rearmost tooth to half height eliminate the wear.
The marui piston also has the 2nd rearmost tooth issue.
After those modifications, both the CA pistons and Marui pistons can take M150 springs, having both tested them on a CA249 with 3 box mag worth of rounds within a week. Most of the CA guns I have tuned with the modified piston are still functioning with M120-M140 springs.
Edited by 3vi1-D4n, 01 November 2009 - 09:33 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



























