Updates from CA
#1
Posted 20 January 2006 - 07:18 PM
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=245&pg=1
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=246&pg=1
Posters of the AUG A1
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=248&pg=1
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=249&pg=1
SLR 105 parts and accessories (most intersting is the railed handguard and the Bulgarian style 7.62mm magazine)
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=251&pg=1
Oh, and CAs calendar for 2006:
http://www.classicarmy.com/showcatalogue.jsp?acid=253&pg=1
#2
Posted 20 January 2006 - 07:24 PM

I wants the HK416!
#3
Posted 20 January 2006 - 07:29 PM
#4
Posted 20 January 2006 - 08:11 PM
Must have one of the AUG's though, even if I have to smuggle it from France in a giant gateau.
#5
Posted 20 January 2006 - 09:06 PM
gateaux
#6
Posted 26 January 2006 - 10:59 PM
#7
Posted 29 January 2006 - 03:15 AM
#8
Posted 29 January 2006 - 06:46 PM
#9
Posted 29 January 2006 - 09:37 PM
#10
Posted 30 January 2006 - 05:57 PM
#11
Posted 31 January 2006 - 09:47 AM
All the designs are, as usual, eerily similar to the old Marui ones -- good for CA, but in cases like the AUG, are S-M trades, included M100, and stiffer fibre receiver worth that much?
Semper Fi!




#12
Posted 31 January 2006 - 09:55 AM
All the designs are, as usual, eerily similar to the old Marui ones -- good for CA, but in cases like the AUG, are S-M trades, included M100, and stiffer fibre receiver worth that much?
There are indications that CA will be making a full line of G3 AEGs.

#13
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:13 PM
Well, if one were looking for a Military Aug, they could either pay $300-350 for a used TM in decent condition, or buy a brand new one with better metal parts for around the same price. So yes, I would say it's "worth that much".
#14
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:48 PM
If I can get a more solid gun, with better internals (7mm reinforced gearbox with the m100, metal berrings, better gears) and better externals (steel catch, better plastics, better feel) for only a few bux more (280 TM vs the 330 CA) i think it more than worth it.
Besides I have now seen two broken augs that came from shipping, one brand new, and the charging handle was busted right off...
#16
Posted 22 February 2006 - 03:04 AM
If they did... plus the re-inforced goodies that CA has, than
CA AUG FOR THE WIN!
Edited by miniaegmaster, 22 February 2006 - 03:05 AM.
#17
Posted 24 February 2006 - 11:16 AM
Id love to own one should they prove decent.
Edited by Death By Cadbury, 24 February 2006 - 11:17 AM.
#18
Posted 24 February 2006 - 02:05 PM
Id love to own one should they prove decent.
The one that I had a look at had beautiful optics. Very clear and effectively useable unlike the TM optics. You can tell they took some time putting this gun together. They even reinforced the fore grip with more metal and it didn't feel flimsy as all like the TM version.
Jeff
#19
Posted 24 February 2006 - 05:03 PM
#20
Posted 26 February 2006 - 09:00 AM
that's it?!
(where did you hear such info?)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
























