Unco New CA Releases
#1
Posted 05 October 2006 - 10:26 AM
#2
Posted 05 October 2006 - 12:58 PM
#3
Posted 05 October 2006 - 02:11 PM
I like the AUG, though.
Edit: Scratch that, OVER $400 because of shipping and a crane stock bat.
Edited by joker, the frickin ninja, 05 October 2006 - 02:12 PM.
Just for Fun: KWA M11
#4
Posted 05 October 2006 - 02:54 PM
I like the AUG, though.
Edit: Scratch that, OVER $400 because of shipping and a crane stock bat.
The real question is what the internals look like. These maybe great models for CQB if they come pre-upgraded like the CA M15-A4 CQB. I don't believe they were designed for woodland, just like that Special Purpose Rifle probably wasn't necessarily designed for CQB.
Though personally I don't like them, I think they look funny.
#5
Posted 05 October 2006 - 06:40 PM
#6
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:22 PM
Though personally I don't like them, I think they look funny.
I said that because a good majority of people that I know that play in the US primarily play woodland, though I am not sure of other countries. And it is still to big to sling as a sidearm like the MP5K. Probably too heavy as well.
Just for Fun: KWA M11
#7
Posted 05 October 2006 - 09:58 PM
1. Just because people around you only play woodland doesn't mean that the whole nation does, and that said; many woodland sites have CQB/village areas where this would be nice.
2. http://www.geocities.com/lemtheminer/m2rig.html
Edited by skyler8158, 05 October 2006 - 09:59 PM.
#8
Posted 05 October 2006 - 10:17 PM
Edit:
The CQBRs...I wonder what theyd look like with all the ridiculous sticklebrick removed. I might buy one as a pistol as long as it doesnt look too pants and I can carry a battery somewhere with it and the stock gone.
Edited by GuzziHero, 05 October 2006 - 10:19 PM.
#9
Posted 06 October 2006 - 04:00 AM
I like the AUG, though.
Edit: Scratch that, OVER $400 because of shipping and a crane stock bat.
What makes it "useless" in woodland? Does it somehow automatically shut down when taken outside of concrete surroundings?

#10
Posted 06 October 2006 - 04:17 AM
Just for Fun: KWA M11
#11
Posted 06 October 2006 - 05:29 AM
#12
Posted 06 October 2006 - 06:45 PM
#13
Posted 06 October 2006 - 06:52 PM
The front sites are different. The SEAL has a detachable front site and additional rails.
739_pi5_cqb5.jpg 59.01K
79 downloads
763_pi5_seal22.jpg 53.52K
113 downloads
Edited by Will Pwr, 06 October 2006 - 06:58 PM.
#14
Posted 06 October 2006 - 06:57 PM
Most airsofters I know hardly bother with semi-auto on AEG's, and considering accuracy is probally hardly worse than a carbine I doubt it matters.
#15
Posted 07 October 2006 - 05:30 AM
#16
Posted 08 October 2006 - 12:16 AM
#17
Posted 08 October 2006 - 12:21 AM
IRL, the barrel length would have a great effect on how usable the guns are outdoors. But this isn't real life, it's airsoft. The differences are not significant.

#18
Posted 08 October 2006 - 03:34 AM
Just for Fun: KWA M11
#19
Posted 08 October 2006 - 03:53 AM
Hopefully soon they'll rectify the M15A4 RIS so that's the case.
#20
Posted 09 October 2006 - 09:05 AM
Really? I fail to see it. The inner barrel isn't huge, but the effect on accuracy is far less than the effect of being an a**clown, which is far more common an issue than a short barrel.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















