Atsalakotos Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 http://www.publicenemy.com.hk/?p=7423 Sooooo.... This made me wander even more about the whereabouts of my MP5 and SCAR-H GBB...... What is this? Black Ops 2 maybe?? EDIT: Good news is that it seems to be Marui compatible... Link to post Share on other sites
FireKnife Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 What The *fruitcage* is that piece of disgusting *suitcase*, get it away, now, in fact burn it, with fire, lots and lote of fire, please. 'FireKnife' Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Is this an expansion of this ; http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/index.php?/topic/206755-prototype-mp7/ Or are they different. Appearance wise they don't look the same, but maybe the switched things up. Kind of sucks though that WE will have to modify their models and have no trades just to get released... :| Link to post Share on other sites
Probotector Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 I... kinda like this. <3 Link to post Share on other sites
renegadecow Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Because this goes beyond what the original "Jackie Chan WTF" image conveys. Link to post Share on other sites
carabinero Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 According to google translate, they mention something about a kit for a body conversion of some sort and having a low price, Would be great that they could sell a very cheap franken-gun and then a MP7 body or receiver kit for a very competitive price... But again, why WE can make and sell the G39 series without issues but not the other guns? *** EDIT *** WE hinted at their FB page that: "final form factor may change in final release ..." Link to post Share on other sites
blobface Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Why cant they just release the internals and have one of their alias companies make the full trade body... Link to post Share on other sites
L2E Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Why cant they just release the internals and have one of their alias companies make the full trade body... Makes too much sense to do that... Link to post Share on other sites
tquilha Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 I kinda like it... But they can take my KWA when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers... Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Is this an expansion of this ; http://www.arniesairsoft.co.uk/forums/index.php?/topic/206755-prototype-mp7/ Or are they different. Appearance wise they don't look the same, but maybe the switched things up. Kind of sucks though that WE will have to modify their models and have no trades just to get released... :| Don't think so, that gun was not a a WE... Link to post Share on other sites
Roman! Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 For what they had to do to avoid the copy right issue I do not think this is a bad effort. Not nearly as clean as the actual MP7, but if it is TM compatiable it may be a good performer in the field. Link to post Share on other sites
rvlyssup Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 *fruitcage* thats ugly! Why cant they just release the internals and have one of their alias companies make the full trade body... This. For the first time, I actualy agree with FK. Link to post Share on other sites
NonEx Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Don't think so, that gun was not a a WE... Yeah, who's was it then ? Ah right, it was that custom build from Taiwan 1:1... Right. But still those damn video names and sequences! WE has to be involved or that guy is involved with WE. Link to post Share on other sites
blobface Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Yeah, who's was it then ? I thought the mystery mp7 was meant to be the VFC 1:1 one at the end? Link to post Share on other sites
Lone_Bullet Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Good base for a Sci-Fi based gun. Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Yeah, who's was it then ? Ah right, it was that custom build from Taiwan 1:1... Right. But still those damn video names and sequences! WE has to be involved or that guy is involved with WE. That guy now works for AST, which basically does a bunch of airsoft stuff. He is no more related to an OEM than anyone in Redwolf's video or Public Enemy's video....you are reading way too much into it... Link to post Share on other sites
MRF Posted January 25, 2013 Report Share Posted January 25, 2013 Awww... it's just an unruly child of good will and lack of licensing... Personally I've always thought about such an attempts as something pointless. But stil, here You go . Link to post Share on other sites
carabinero Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 Don't think so, that gun was not a a WE... The internal pics in WE's FB page show identical pieces to those on ArmsCool forum, go figure... Link to post Share on other sites
Tw1tch Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 Not sure if I "like" it or not. Its probably not for me due to building towards loadouts (primarily SEAL inspired at the moment) but I cannot decide whether I like the aesthetics or not. Link to post Share on other sites
RacingManiac Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 ^^ Plot thickens.... Link to post Share on other sites
(V)atrix Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 I like the folding grip being replaced with a rail (something I asked an HK rep at SHOT about a few years back, much to his absolute and utter disgust - guess now I know what they mean by "no compromise!")... But the rest of that abomination looks like absolute *fruitcage*! Think I'll be seconding the "burn it with fire" vote. Link to post Share on other sites
Danke Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 I like the folding grip being replaced with a rail (something I asked an HK rep at SHOT about a few years back, much to his absolute and utter disgust - guess now I know what they mean by "no compromise!")... But the rest of that abomination looks like absolute *fruitcage*! Think I'll be seconding the "burn it with fire" vote. H&K's company line is "Nein!'. Link to post Share on other sites
T3CH Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 Makes too much sense to do that... it's more to do with Umarex owning the rights to realistically trademarked MP7s. Link to post Share on other sites
rusTORK Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 Burn it! And when only ashes left, burn it too! P.S. Such a pokemon... Link to post Share on other sites
intinerious Posted January 26, 2013 Report Share Posted January 26, 2013 Why cant they just release the internals and have one of their alias companies make the full trade body... Interestingly the HK3P brand hasn't released any new guns under their 'brand name' ever since the M9s and the PX4s (were there more? I don't remember). One would think that whoever the 'OEM' is will try to reuse the HK3P brand after their success with the PX4, right? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.